<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The relevance of job posting and business networking sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomaspowell.com/2010/02/06/the-relevance-of-job-posting-and-business-networking-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomaspowell.com/2010/02/06/the-relevance-of-job-posting-and-business-networking-sites/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Powell</title>
		<link>http://thomaspowell.com/2010/02/06/the-relevance-of-job-posting-and-business-networking-sites/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaspowell.com/?p=285#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  Moreover, I find it amazing how useless the concept of formal &quot;references&quot; seems to be these days.

To the point of &quot;who you know&quot;:  I have only seen a couple of examples where the interview process selected a candidate, one in which the lead candidate was trumped by the interview of another candidate.  

Furthermore, in many cases, the lack of connectedness goes both ways:  Often the job itself fails to attract applicants with more than 50% relevance in their resume.  I can recall at least two or three examples where a public job board posting didn&#039;t generate applicants leads for a phone screen, and we ended up trying to applicant leads the old fashioned &quot;networking&quot; way.

I think personal knowledge of a person overrides technical knowledge of a person.  You can quickly get a feel for work ethic and ability to learn when you know somebody, where 5 million certifications and 200 references will easily generate a dud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Moreover, I find it amazing how useless the concept of formal &#8220;references&#8221; seems to be these days.</p>
<p>To the point of &#8220;who you know&#8221;:  I have only seen a couple of examples where the interview process selected a candidate, one in which the lead candidate was trumped by the interview of another candidate.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, in many cases, the lack of connectedness goes both ways:  Often the job itself fails to attract applicants with more than 50% relevance in their resume.  I can recall at least two or three examples where a public job board posting didn&#8217;t generate applicants leads for a phone screen, and we ended up trying to applicant leads the old fashioned &#8220;networking&#8221; way.</p>
<p>I think personal knowledge of a person overrides technical knowledge of a person.  You can quickly get a feel for work ethic and ability to learn when you know somebody, where 5 million certifications and 200 references will easily generate a dud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hall</title>
		<link>http://thomaspowell.com/2010/02/06/the-relevance-of-job-posting-and-business-networking-sites/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaspowell.com/?p=285#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine applying for a job cold... Especially these days. But it seems that&#039;s what people expect when they&#039;re on the hunt.

I have found out that it&#039;s all about who knows you and will vouch for you in the organization, and basically the only way somebody will attach their name to yours is if you&#039;ve worked together in some capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine applying for a job cold&#8230; Especially these days. But it seems that&#8217;s what people expect when they&#8217;re on the hunt.</p>
<p>I have found out that it&#8217;s all about who knows you and will vouch for you in the organization, and basically the only way somebody will attach their name to yours is if you&#8217;ve worked together in some capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

